To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Non-digital Ten-Tec transceivers |
From: | William Lee <n5wrx@stx.rr.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sun, 11 Jun 2006 18:14:35 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Jim, why the Omni C before the Omni D? William Lee On Jun 11, 2006, at 5:20 PM, James C. Owen, III wrote: > Hi Ken, > I think all of the TT's before the OMNI V, Paragon are > non-digital except for the display on some. My choice would be > 1st a Corsair II, 2nd Corsair, 3rd Omni C, 4th any other Omni A,D > etc. If you want the WARC bands then a Corsair will be your best > choice. > 73 Jim K4CGY > > --- Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> wrote: > _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Non-digital Ten-Tec transceivers, James C. Owen, III |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Non-digital Ten-Tec transceivers, CATFISHTWO |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Non-digital Ten-Tec transceivers, James C. Owen, III |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Non-digital Ten-Tec transceivers, James C. Owen, III |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |