Well, I just read the E-review on the Jupiter being rated "JUNK". I've
learned a couple of things worth mentioning:
1. from the work go??? Did he mean the WORD go or can he NOT SPELL WORD -
Dah!!
2. If a person is POSTING their comments, and WON't comment on his/her
findings, then it must have been that time of the month, so how can you
intelligently interpret what ISN't there? Dah!!
3. Now it has been OFFICIALLY CONFIRMED, "THAT YOU CAN HOLD AN EXTRA CLASS
LICENSE AND BE A IDIOT AT THE SAME TIME!! Dah!!
But I do agree that the Jupiter is "JUNK"!!
"J" Stands for Jupiter
"U" United States Engineered and Manufactured
"N" New "SDR" Technology
"K" Stands for a KEEPER!!
His comments, albeit may not be appreciated, THANK GOD this is America, and
he has the right to say so. Thank GOD the Constitution DOES NOT state that
you have to be INTELLIGENT to be PROTECTED!!
Guess I'll go listen to Rush Limbaugh and watch the Simpson's on TV!! No,
I'm going to turn on my JUPITER and listen in the Extra Class segment of the
bands and maybe I'll learn something!! Dah!!
Brad Bradford
W9GOD / NNN0PKC Navy Marine Corps MARS
<html><DIV><FONT color=#009966>With appreciation(!!) </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#009966></FONT></DIV><FONT color=#009966>Very truly yours,
</FONT>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#009966></FONT></DIV><FONT color=#009966><IMG height=12
src="http://graphics.hotmail.com/emsmile.gif"; width=12>Brad Bradford<IMG
height=12 src="http://graphics.hotmail.com/emsmile.gif";
width=12></FONT></html>
>From: "Phil Chambley, Sr." <k4dpk@comcast.net>
>Reply-To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
>To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
>Subject: Re: [TenTec] Lousy eham review
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 22:12:42 -0400
>
>Occasionally, one happens to buy a radio that is just a little smarter than
>the buyer.
>
>Phil
>VFO Stabilizers and PEP adapters for wattmeters...Check out
>http://home.comcast.net/~k4dpk
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
>To: <tentec@contesting.com>
>Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 10:05 PM
>Subject: [TenTec] Lousy eham review
>
>
>I read that one a day or two ago. At the time I thought it probably came
>from an inexperienced ham. Could be wrong but to me that's the way it
>looked. I'm not a big jupiter fan but this kind of review is not useful.
>
>rob / k5uj
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
>http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|
![http://graphics.hotmail.com/emsmile.gif"](http://graphics.hotmail.com/emsmile.gif"){kind=link}