Caity and all, any idea at what point (s/n?) the receiver sensitivity
improved? I have a 6N2 and
wouldn't part with it. There are so few out there that they are now a
sought-after item.
I like your suggestion of having 1.25m coverage, and this would be a
good place for T-T to step
up to the plate. The Japanese radios don't have that band because it
isn't an amateur band
outside of our region.
73 de Jim - AD6CW
Caitlyn Martin wrote:
>[...]
>
>BTW, what killed the 6N2's ability to sell was the fact that it only
>covered two bands and that early versions seemed to have relatively
>poor receiver sensitivity, particularly on 2m. V/UHFers are weak signal
>people. They need superior receiver performance or they won't buy a rig
>no matter how inexpensive it is.
>
>Anyway, just my .02.... I don't expect Ten Tec to produce either of my
>dream rigs.
>
>73,
>Caity
>K7VO
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|