TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] [Fwd: FCC ELIMINATES CW EXAM]

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] [Fwd: FCC ELIMINATES CW EXAM]
From: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:44:20 +0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Thank you KC4ATU. You have echoed the feelings of thousands. Every amateur 
operator who did not want to see the code dropped, but who did not write the 
FCC, at the urging of a very hard working ARRL, has unintentionally allowed 
this to happen. We could not have changed it anyway, but our voices should have 
been heard.
So what can we do now? Continue to operate CW as we have in the past. Enjoy it 
and show the world that it is still a viable force in our communications.
That's it. Let's focus our energies in the positive side of things. The ARRL 
has done a heck of a lot to keep us informed of what is happening and to enable 
us to operate at all

WA3MKB

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "bill rowlett" <c4atu@hotmail.com> 

> 
> 
> 
> >From: "AD5VJ Bob" 
> > 
> > So tell me something: 
> > 
> >I am a member of many many lists on Yahoo and have not caught up reading 
> >all of them today because of this news that the ARRL 
> >dropped the ball on Amateur Radio again. 
> > 
> >Not one response that I read so far, was in favor of this move on any of 
> >those lists. 
> > 
> >So my question is: 
> >How about we form a League of some kind that will protect and represent our 
> >interests as LICENSED Amateur Radio Operators? 
> > 
> >Sounds like the unlicensed folks have their League already, we just pay for 
> >it annually. 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> This has been coming for many years. You and I have had ample time to yet 
> the FCC know how we feal about it. The international community has gone this 
> route and now so do we. The ARRL was not behind a total elimination. They 
> wanted to retain it for Extra Class, so get off the lets bash the ARRL. They 
> are not correct all the time and neither are you or me, so cool it with the 
> bashing, grow up. 
> 
> When CW was droped from the shipping industry and from the military, the 
> hand writing was on the wall. Freight trains are hard to stop 
> 
> What now, USE it, be EXCITED about it, and TEACH it. It will last as a mode 
> of operation, AM is still here. 
> 
> 
> 73, KC4ATU 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message----- 
> > > From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com 
> > > [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Douglas Shock 
> > > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:55 PM 
> > > To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment 
> > > Subject: Re: [TenTec] [Fwd: FCC ELIMINATES CW EXAM] 
> > > 
> > > what a shame 
> > > 
> > > On 12/15/06, Ken N9VV wrote: 
> > > > 
> > > > Looks like it is for real! 
> > > > http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269012A1.pdf 
> > > > de ken n9vv (old CW Dinosaur) 
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________ 
> > > > TenTec mailing list 
> > > > TenTec@contesting.com 
> > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 
> > > > 
> > > _______________________________________________ 
> > > TenTec mailing list 
> > > TenTec@contesting.com 
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> >_______________________________________________ 
> >TenTec mailing list 
> >TenTec@contesting.com 
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________ 
> Talk now to your Hotmail contacts with Windows Live Messenger. 
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://get.liv
>  
> e.com/messenger/overview 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> TenTec mailing list 
> TenTec@contesting.com 
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>