TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Code and everything else

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Code and everything else
From: John R <W3ULS@3n.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:14:09 -0800
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
My two cents:

1. On this one, ARRL did all it could. Joel Hallas' post pretty much says it all.

2. I'm glad W8JI was successful well before now in his quest for manufacturers to clean up their key clicks. From here on out, I do not see any incentive for manufacturers to care one way or the other about the CW envelopes their transceivers will be producing, QSK or whatever. But now we have Yaesu, Ten-Tec and Icom with first-class rigs that do not mess up the spectrum and pretty good QSK. We owe W8JI a vote of thanks for what he's accomplished.

3. K4IA noted on eHam.net that if Technicians want to enjoy the new spectrum privileges they have on the HF bands, they will have to use CW. If they want to use phone, they'll have to upgrade to General. So there is a built-in incentive in the FCC's regs for continued use of CW by newcomers. I like that.

On another subject, the FCC has carved out a 15 kc segment of the 80 meter CW band just below 3600 for all this Pactor/WinLink stuff. Seems a good place to put those stations which otherwise could cause problems.

Finally, it looks to me that Bill Cross of the FCC is looking forward to retirement. He has taken all of the tough issues and dealt with them. He will leave quite an impressive legacy, IMHO. I know I'd be ready to go after this latest burst of activity.

73,
John, W3ULS

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>