TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code
From: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@qsl.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:20:58 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Thanks, Joel, for setting the record straight on that. Let's all 
remember that it is the elected division directors who set ARRL policy, 
not the HQ staffers.


                                        73,

                                        Bob WB2VUF

joel hallas wrote:
> Well folks, I've been biting my tounge (fingers?) for days but can't 
> stand it any more! I must remark in support of Carter's comment.
> In terms of the folks who run the ARRL, I can say that they are 
> definately not anti-CW. In fact:
> 
> CEO, K1ZZ, is a very hot CW contester, DXer and DXpedition op who 
> understands and uses CW extensively and with great proficiency. It's the 
> only mode I've heard him on.
> COO, WJ1B, works most modes, but I've only worked him on CW and he 
> certainly is a fine op.
> Mgr of F&ES, N1NN, is an ex Navy radio op, and one of the best on CW
> Mgr of MSD, N7NG, is a DXpedition op and CW contestor of long standing.
> Sr. News Reporter, N1RL, regularly operates CW at 40 wpm from his car, 
> as well as from home.
> Even the lowly QST Technical Editor is 90% a CW op and is usually on 40 
> CW on his way to Hq!
> 
> Of course there are others, both phone and CW ops, and I'm sure I've 
> left off some great CW op members of the Hq team, but I certainly take 
> issue with the statement that ARRL Hq leadership is "anti-CW." I know 
> that they were not happy at the FCC action. Nor were they happy about 
> much of the fone band increase.
> 
> 73, Joel
> 
> Joel R. Hallas, W1ZR
> Technical Editor, QST
> ARRL
> 
> Carter, K8VT wrote:
> 
>> john wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> Its pretty sad that some people believe the ARRL did anything to keep
>>> code. Regardless of multiple member polls, they've always been
>>> lukewarm code supporters at best.
>>>    
>>>
>> John,
>>
>> Pardon me for smiling, but....
>>
>> ...for -years- people were bitching that the ARRL was run by a bunch of 
>> old pro-code geezers that hated phone. Now you are saying that "they've 
>> always been
>> lukewarm code supporters at best".
>>
>> It seems like the poor ARRL just can't win.
>>
>> Carter, K8VT
>> Licensed and an ARRL member since 1959
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>>  
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>