To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] CW needs its own list |
From: | "K7AAY john@503bartley.com" <john.bartley@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | john@503bartley.com,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:03:16 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
May I please suggest a separate list be established to discuss CW matters? I don't mean to denigrate the magicians of brass, but it's a rather different issue than Ten-Tec equipment and therefore should have its own place. 73s and best regards K7AAY _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Eliminating CW as a License Requirement, Geoffrey S. Mendelson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] CW needs its own list, Fred Lemley |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Looking for nice replacement upper case shell for 255 PS, Jerry Volpe |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] CW needs its own list, Fred Lemley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |