To: | "donhall161" <donhall161@sbcglobal.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for QSLing now? |
From: | "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net> |
Reply-to: | Carl Moreschi <n4py@arrl.net>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:53:27 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
But not if you use the buro which is where a great many of my QSL's came from. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 ----- Original Message ----- From: "donhall161" <donhall161@sbcglobal.net> To: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:45 PM Subject: Re: [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for QSLing now? > The 10 to 20 cents per confirmation seems pretty cheap to me compared to 2 > GS plus airmail postage. > > 73 Don K5AQ > (yes, I participate in the DXCC > Challenge) > _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for QSLing now?, donhall161 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for QSLing now?, Ron Notarius W3WN |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for QSLing now?, donhall161 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for QSLing now?, donhall161 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |