the xyl? ;>)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Gates, KD3JF" <pearly732003@yahoo.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 3:03 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII
>I would love to have a Omni VII ! Now lets see.... What do I have that I
>can sell?
>
> Paul
>
> Art Lewis <wa8vsj@ameritech.net> wrote: John
>
> I have talked to three owners of new Omni VII and they sound great and the
> owners love them. None of these hams were using it with a computer and
> only
> one had plans to do so in the future. They all thought receiver was great.
>
> 73 Art WA8VSJ
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Rippey"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 9:58 PM
> Subject: [TenTec] Omni VII
>
>
>> I'm intrigued by the lack of comments on the July QST review of the
>> OMNI VII.
>>
>> It's a very good radio, if a bit pricey, for everyday ham use, and I
>> would have thought there would be discussion of the review and lab
>> results. Not so.
>>
>> Is it because the radio has no appeal to participants in this list?
>> Can it be that the radio's major appeal is to computer-bound folks
>> who want to operate remotely?
>>
>> That's certainly the theme of Ten-Tec's advertising, at least.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|