TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue
From: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:53:51 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Proprietary software is "non-value added?"  I think we need to start
discussions here with definitions.  

        73, Duane

Duane Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas
www.ac5aa.com  
 
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Kevin Purcell
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:02 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Cc: Kevin Purcell
Subject: Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue

The question for a company like TenTec is "where is their added-value".

I would think most of their added-value is in their hardware design  
rather than in their software design (though as the latter is  
proprietary it's more difficult to see if they're using novel  
techniques and then protecting them as trade secrets in not revealing  
the hardware).

...snip...

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>