TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue
From: "Paul Gates, KD3JF" <pearly732003@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Mike that is the problem with the 706 having VHF, UHF. If I had a radio which 
was for 160-10 I would be happy. You know why I feel that way? I am not an 
engineer! I am not a complainer. I have a 706 MKIIG and my TenTec Triton IV 
handles noise a lot better than the 706.

Mike K9MI <k9mi@sbcglobal.net> wrote: 
> "Looking forward to the Orion III, which hopefully will also have 6, 2, 
> and
> 440, making it the only radio one would EVER need (after all, why should 
> my
> little cheap IC706 Mk2G have this and not my Orion?)!  C'mon TT, capture 
> the
> market!"



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>