Paul, you are probably aware but if not... here goes.
The Omni-VI Plus provides signal compensation for the 219 filter in the
form of additional in-stage amplification. There is a jumper next to
where the filter is inserted. I used my Omni-VI Plus for several
years... and in contests or serious DX situations the 219 filter found
continual use. Especially in several Field Day efforts where there was a
full-time SSB station operating 50 feet way about 100 kHz up.
Of course if I didn't need it I did. My relief operators were astounded
(all used FT-1000Ds) at how well the "Ten-Tec" worked in separating the
mess.... and they were all using the model 219 filter by choice.
You probably knew all this.
73,
Jerry, KG6TT
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:52:33 -0500
> From: "Paul DeWitte K9OT" <k9ot@mhtc.net>
> Subject: [TenTec] 219 filter
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <000901c8170e$4c4aa340$1fc4b4d8@dfafd>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
>
> I did some more playing with the 219 9mhz filter last night.
>
> I have tried it in both of the n1 and n2 positions. N2 has the inrad roofing
> filter in it also. No difference in either position. I get about a 10 db
> loss which is what T T says is the loss in that filter.
>
> This is regardless of how I play with any other functions, PBT,NR, etc.
>
> This is for weak signal DX on 80&160m. Other bands dont need it. I am just
> trying to lower the QRN to sig ratio.
>
> Thanks for all of the replies and suggestions. I guess it is back to the
> 500hz filters.
>
> 73 Paul K9OT
>
>
>
>
--
KG6TT
Ralph Jerald "Jerry" Volpe
ARRL Member, VE
FISTS Member 12304
Solano County
CM88xg
788 Chestnut Drive
Fairfield, CA 94533
USA
kg6tt@arrl.net
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|