TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Corsair II PTO Problems

To: Rick Denney <rwd@iteris.com>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair II PTO Problems
From: hamradio@twcny.rr.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:19:00 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Rick: Was the Paragon General Coverage?
thanks
Nick


----- Original Message -----
From: Rick Denney <rwd@iteris.com>
Date: Thursday, November 29, 2007 9:20 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair II PTO Problems
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>

> hamradio@twcny.rr.com writes...
> 
> > Thanks for the info, what was a better rig, the Paragon or the 
> Omni V?
> > thanks
> 
> The Omni V, unless you want a general coverage receiver for short 
wave
> listening. From all reports, the Paragon II was better than the
> Paragon (and the Paragon isn't bad), but the Omni V and VI used a
> conversion scheme that resulted in much less phase noise, and
> therefore had the better receivers for demanding conditions in the 
ham
> bands.
> 
> Rick, KR9D
> 
> ---
> Richard W. Denney, Jr. PE|Iteris, Inc.
> Associate Vice President |107 Carpenter Dr. Ste 230 |    703.925.3819
> rwd@iteris.com           |Sterling, VA 20164        |Fax 703.471.1757
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>