TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Older rigs for digital modes

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Older rigs for digital modes
From: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:20:11 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I have a different view.  I do digital modes on my Corsairs (I and II).
After they warm up for a bit, the frequency stability is excellent.  I have
no drift problem.  Have made 100's of Q's this way.

73 de Gary, AA2IZ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed - K9EW" <k9ew57@gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Older rigs for digital modes


> Hi JT,
>
> I know I can't do it on my Argosy because of the frequency drift.  So
> I would think any of the frequncy synthesized Ten Tecs would be about
> as far back as you could go.  This does not include digital *readout*,
> since that could have an analog PTO.
>
> Good question.
>
> 73,
> ed - k9ew
> www.k9ew.us
>
> On Jan 12, 2008 9:09 AM, JT Croteau <jt.n1ese@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What would be a good older TT rig suitable for audio-generated digital
> > modes such as AFSK RTTY, PSK, and Olivia (my modes of interest)? Would
> > the Corsair and Corsair II and Omni V be about as far back as one
> > could go?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> > JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
> > Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>