TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] New generation ham's

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New generation ham's
From: "Art Lewis" <wa8vsj@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:53:49 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Ralph

Thank you for putting my feelings into words. Hope you enjoy another 44 
hamming years.

 73 Art WA8VSJ
        71 with 41 hamming yrs.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ralph Covington" <ralph.covington@hotmail.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New generation ham's


>
> Ah well..................I may be drawn and quartered but here 
> goes........... I have a collection of QST's back to 1919 and you would 
> not believe the heated discussions (cussing and discussing) about the 
> changeover from Spark to cw.  The 'Spark Forever' group of those days have 
> just changed their arguments a little (read that 'updated') and now we 
> have the keyboards vs electronic paddles vs VibroPlexes vs handkeys (how 
> about a Martin AutoPlex?),and then there's the contesters vs the 
> weekenders vs the traffickers, etc.   Come on fellows and gals, there's a 
> lot of bandwidth out there and even the most esoteric digital modes can 
> fit in.  The different modes, different interests (rag chew, casual 
> operation, die-hard contesters, die-hard traffic folk, even experimenters) 
> have always made room for each other (well, mostly..........remember the 
> SSB vs AM absolute brutal wars of the early 70's?  AM is for the most part 
> got shoved aside).   Courtesy and recognition of the 'unauthoriz
> ed' sub band plans have, with courtesyand understanding, worked well and 
> will continue to do so.  And if courtesy goes by the board then I guess it 
> is back to R/C Model Planes and golf for me (and I ain't a fan of golf in 
> any way, form or fashion).   So, if he (or she) uses a keyboard and 
> Windows version whatever with an MFJ reader and if he (or she) is 
> comfortable with that then so am I, although, for me, I still personally 
> prefer my Autek Memory Keyer and a decent iambic paddle for sending and 
> for receiving the ears that God gave me (have to turn up the 
> volume -opps......turn up the AF & RF a little more, though).   A QSO is a 
> QSO even if it's using a 100 watt incandescent bulb as antennas on each 
> end at a distance of some 200 feet - and I have one of those - truly. 
> Lighten up, this is supposed to be fun. All the Best to Everyone, vy 73, 
> Ralph/W7SK (at age 70 es ham for 44 - thanks to W4DGL & W6LMJ & K5GPE)-30- 
> ============================================================
> ==== Old hams not being able to copy CW? Old in age or old in terms of 
> being licensed. Which is it? Or are both being lumped together? Big 
> DifferenceEquipment: some of the older will do what some of the newer 
> wont.Key, bug, paddle, or keyboard, all basically do the same. When one 
> graduates from ' SEE SPOT RUN' you can move up to a keyboard. 50 to 70 or 
> so WPM is good conversational speed. (full qsk of course)Try that with 
> some of the newer equipment.I doubt if those knocking a keyboard still go 
> to the grocery store in a horse and buggy.Sometimes with some things its 
> 'time to move on'No need to be sorry Marinus, not many of us (somewhat ot) 
> left. Some of the newer fellows have 21st century technology and 18th well 
> maybe 19th, century operating habits. etc...etc...Lyle W9FCX
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>