Well, all you have to do is consider the source. Since it is a US goverment
requirement (RFR testing), you know it is flawed.. Thanks Ron, I have
wholeheartly agreed with everything you have said..
W6RD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim WA9YSD" <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield
> Leukemia I read the survey results From the FCC and other publications
> on biological effects or RFI. No authority on the subject by a long
> shot. Magnetic fields and inadequate shielding is a hazard. Follow
> the ARRL publications on the distances and FCC requirements for annual
> testing of your station, and you cannot go wrong. The fact that they
> even want us to do this should say HAY THERE IS SOMETHING TO THIS !
> Keep The Faith, Jim K9TF/WA9YSD
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|