| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Double bazooka antenna==a follow up |
| From: | w8au@sssnet.com |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 01 Jun 2008 14:12:38 -0400 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
At 12:43 PM 6/1/2008, you wrote: >Besides, what fun would be a simple 40 meter dipole? I've had those >for 35 years. Aw, c'mon.... SIMPLE is best. Did you ever read Walt Maxwell's (W2DU) expose' of the double bazooka? In QST. It's also a chapter in his antenna book. Great reading that will cut thru the hype... :-) PB _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Double bazooka antenna==a follow up, Mike Christiansen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OI Audio 'Pop', Bruce McLaughlin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Double bazooka antenna==a follow up, Mike Bryce |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Double bazooka antenna==a follow up, Mike Bryce |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |