| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Double bazooka antenna==a follow up |
| From: | Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 1 Jun 2008 16:32:46 -0700 (PDT) |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I found the antenna to be just as quiet as a folded dipole when I ran a
comparison on 17M last year for about 3 weeks. The double bazooka was a better
receiving antenna when I tested them.
Keep The Faith, Jim K9TF/WA9YSD
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Double bazooka antenna==a follow up, John Graves |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] FW: qsonet, John L Merrill |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Double bazooka antenna==a follow up, Mike Christiansen |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Omni VI Logic Board, RLBrannigan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |