TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] The Titan IIII IV????

To: <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>, Ten Tec List <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Titan IIII IV????
From: Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:56:00 +0000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Roman numbers for 4 is written "IV."
 
Charles Harpole 
 
k4vud@hotmail.com 
 
 
 
 
> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:14:15 -1000> From: ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> To: 
> tentec@contesting.com> Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Titan IIII ????> > > > a 
> true legal limit 1500 watts amp.> > > >> > > There are various 
> interpretations of what a true legal limit 1500 watt > amplifier is. To some 
> that means it can produce 1500 watts peak in SSB > service, but less in CW or 
> RTTY service. Others say it is true legal > limit if it can put out 1500 
> watts for a short period of time, like a > minute with 5 or 10 minutes of 
> idle time, in CW or RTTY mode. And there > are those (myself included) who 
> insist it is not a full legal limit > amplifier unless it can put out 1500 
> watts in high duty cycle, nearly > 100% duty cycle, RTTY or CW contesting. 
> There are a lot of people who > stick with tube amplifiers, because few if 
> any of the solid state > offerings are true full legal limit 1500 watt 
> amplifiers by that > definition. If Ten-Tec made one, it would be one of the 
> few available, > and if
  the price was comparable to similarly capable tube amps, it might > sell a 
bunch.> > DE N6KB> > _______________________________________________> TenTec 
mailing list> TenTec@contesting.com> 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>