I think you were foolish to return it without trying it.
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Henry Mackey <kb9cqo@embarqmail.com> wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> These comments are interesting. I had a 715 and returned it.
>
> My rig is a Jupiter. Consenses was that the Jupiter did as well as could be
> expected without it. As a result it was returned without even giving it a
> trial run.
>
> Now I'm thinking there may have been a rush to judgement on my part.
>
> Henry/n9hm
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: w1dxh@aol.com
> To: atrampler@att.net, tentec@contesting.com
> Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2009 7:50:59 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] 715 question
>
>
> no, I have an Orion and purchased the 715 to use with it. You disable the
> Orions built in processor and use just the 715. I have been extremely happy
> with the results. It PLAYS.
>
>
>
> 73,
>
> Steve W1DXH
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Art Trampler <atrampler@att.net>
> To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment' <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Fri, Sep 4, 2009 11:54 pm
> Subject: [TenTec] 715 question
>
>
>
>
> Not owning an Orion or Orion II, is the internal speech processor on either
> f them an RF speech processor comparable in function and results to the
> 15?
>
> In other words, would the 715 be redundant with either of these?
>
> Thanks,
> Art Trampler, KØRO
>
> _______________________________________________
> enTec mailing list
> enTec@contesting.com
> ttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
--
Paul, KD3JF
Glen Burnie, MD
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|