TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Worn out on the continual debates....

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Worn out on the continual debates....
From: "EI6DL" <ei6dl@eircom.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:29:26 -0000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Jerry !
Well said. Thank you for giving voice to the 'silent majority' on this the 
TenTec reflector. Those of you who are so pleased with your K3’es should say 
so on the appropriate site and not here on the Ten Tec one .I have the OII 
as my main station and before that had always been a Drake user. I also did 
consider a K3 and even had one on back order only to cancel it later.” So 
please post on TenTec what is TenTec and to Elecraft what is Elecraft” and 
do no clutter up our e-mail with so much of the same old point scoring 
posting's.

73’es Tony EI6DL (A very happy OII user)





----- Original Message ----- 
From: <d.e.warnick@comcast.net>
To: <kg6tt@arrl.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" 
<tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Worn out on the continual debates....


>
>
> Jerry,
>
> Well said. Thank you for stating what I believe is the frustration of the 
> 'silent majority' on this reflector with the vocal few.
>
>
>
> Dave
>
> WA3MKB
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jerry Volpe" <kg6tt@arrl.net>
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 3:56:48 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: [TenTec] Worn out on the continual debates....
>
> I come to the Ten-Tec Reflectors for information and discussions on how
> to get the best performance out of a particular Ten-Tec. I have no
> interest in learning what the Elecraft can do or not, etc... at least
> not on this reflector. I subscribe to the Elecraft Reflector too. That
> is where I go for information, discussions, etc... related to their
> equipment. I surely wish we could all come to a gentleman's agreement to
> not drag the comparisons on and on. Unfortunately I don't expect that
> level of cooperation. I already went to Digest form a few years back so
> I can quickly skim through the Ten-Tec bashing, Elecraft bashing,....
> whatever. My next stop is to give up altogether and simply
> unsubscribe.... not to that point yet, but getting there. I am not
> looking to cheer TT and carry on high the Ten-Tec banner..... just
> support those who currently own and use a Ten-Tec and gain some support
> myself..... the concept here is that we, current TT owners, can get the
> most out of their equipment investment. Getting a bit tired of the
> Sherwood evaluations too.... I have studied them closely and see none of
> the major transceiver being noticeably superior under actual day-to-day
> use. It is really a lot of subjective opinions as to what specs
> differentiate true differences in performance.
>
> Finally on the subject of those continually weighing in on the TT
> Reflector when they no longer have a TT Transceiver..... frankly, I
> don't get it. If you have an Icom why not 'reflect' on an Icom
> Reflector? If you have an Elecraft.... well you get my thought. My
> thinking is instead of boohooing what we don't have or seeking support
> for our own ego decisions ....why not spend time and energy on the
> reflector/group that supports what you are using? As an RF Engineer and
> a long time ham radio operator, my personal impression is that the
> ultimate differences in performance are so subjective at this level of
> transceiver development and manufacturing to pretty much invalidate
> specific claims of superiority. Seems like simple oneupmanship.... but
> this is my opinion.
>
> Why can't we simply agree to disagree on some points and bring the
> discussions back to supporting Ten-Tec users and Ten-Tec equipment?
> Lastly, it seems to me that there is little value in trying to second
> guess Ten-Tec product development strategy on a reflector. The TT
> support page says nothing about Orion development ceasing. Next week it
> might, but until they actually state that fact why not assume that once
> TT has added to their engineering team they will re-address firmware
> issues for the Orion and Orion II? Probably the best place for our
> firmware related inquires is TT Themselves.... so if you really want to
> know why not write them a letter? My letters get answered... your's
> would too I imagine.
>
> Meanwhile back to DXing with my Orion 565....!
>
> 73 Everyone,
>
> Jerry, KG6TT
>
> -- 
> Ralph Jerald "Jerry" Volpe
> Amateur Radio Operator KG6TT
> ARRL Member & VE
> FISTS 12304
>
> 788 Chestnut Drive
> Fairfield, CA 94533
>
> kg6tt@arrl.net
>
> 510 325-7724
> 707 399-8838 FAXtly
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>