| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = Crunch time |
| From: | Richards <jruing@ameritech.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:39:44 -0500 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Then Go for it! ;-) (I love my Omni VII.... so count my vote for it, but as it is my very first transceiver, I am no expert.) ================ JHR ========================= On 2/2/2010 10:20 PM, Roger Rippy wrote: K8JHR hit it right on the nail head, that this is definitely about my wants and not my needs. ================================================== _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time, CSM\(r\) Gary Huber - AB9M |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] INRAD VS TEN TEC FILTERS, navydude1962 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = Crunch time, DAVID HELLER |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time, Mr Mike |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |