TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Prices

To: geraldj@weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Prices
From: Steve Miller <hsmiller@awsllc.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 08:11:33 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Jerry,

     I think you missed the point.... it wasn't talking about his 
management skills... it was a light story about Art's operating 
skills not about his lack of management skills.   Why pee on the 
guy's story by repeating what you had said previously?   Steve



At 11:06 PM 4/19/2010, you wrote:
>Art's being a good CW op and an innovator didn't make him a good manager
>and it was poor top management that cost him the company. With 20,000
>employees he was still trying to keep his fingers in every project as if
>it was still in his basement with 3 or 4 employees. He didn't allow the
>managers he hired to make decisions. He couldn't delegate tasks and let
>the delegatee function without mother henning him to death. That is a
>hard syndrome to break.
>
>73, Jerry, K0CQ
>
>On 4/19/2010 9:02 PM, Lyle Dunlap wrote:
> > Further the lighter side a bit:  Art Collins W9CXX  was a good CW
> > operator, we had many QSO's. Not sure how we would of made it during WWII
> > without all the Collins equipment.
> >
> > I attended a breakfast at CR where the Lab model of the KWM  was donated
> > to the Collins museum.  Too bad of course to see the company go the way it
> > did.  Changing times would of brought it about no doubt, regardless.
> >
> > BTW Al Kahn was  a fine gent as well, used to attend his summer home
> > sessions.
> >
> > 73  Lyle W9FCX
> >
> >
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>