TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons

To: geraldj@weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Reply-to: ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:26:49 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>

The Omni V and VI use a UHF synthesizer divided down to 5 MHz for the PTO and crystals for the band selects but only include band pass filters for ham bands. No continuous coverage provisions.
Jerry you're right about all you said. In addition to what you said:

The Omni VI (and maybe V) use crystals for the band selects, yet those crystal oscillators are phase locked to the 10 MHz reference oscillator (or is it 20 MHz?). The PLL system is carefully designed to minimize phase noise, probably having low loop gain, narrow bandwidth and long time constants. This is why sometimes when switching to some bands (like 30 meters) you can hear the band select oscillator take a little while to get locked to the reference. The phase noise of that system is very low for a phase locked loop oscillator, yet higher than just a plain crystal oscillator can be.

Does the Omni VI not have as many bandpass filters as the Paragon, and are they narrower than the Paragon's? Maybe, and that may be part of why it can't do continuous coverage. Another reason is not enough crystals in the band select oscillator, where the Paragon uses a PLL, without crystals, that can cover all of the needed frequencies.

The synthesizer divided down to make the 5 MHz VFO is a VCXO not a PTO. The only permeablility tuned oscillators are in the band select oscillators, and those are only tuned to get the crystal oscillators locking to the reference right. Permeability tuning is not used as the variable while you are turning the VFO knob.

DE N6KB

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>