| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C question |
| From: | David Goncalves <davegoncalves@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 May 2010 09:16:35 -0400 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Yeah, only decaying rubber bands. David Goncalves On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Hulett, Russell <rhulett1@consolidated.net>wrote: > That's one advantage for the Omni A, Triton 540, and other analog display > rigs, no timebase, processor, or other chips to deal with. > > 73, Curt KB5JO > _______________________________________________ > TenTec mailing list > TenTec@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec > -- David Goncalves _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C question, Hulett, Russell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C question, ab9go |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C question, Hulett, Russell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C question, ab9go |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |