TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] New software

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New software
From: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 11:20:59 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Where did they note this? I can't seem to find it...

Kim N5OP

At 12:34 PM 6/5/2010, you wrote:
>I see that T-T has posted a comment about the NR.  My own experience,  that
>using a high setting of NR (9) and an AGC slope of 1:10 reduces the popping
>  and distortion, is in line with their comment.  However, it still seems to
>  me that the new NR needs some more "fine tuning."
>
>I've set the sidetone level to 30 and it sounds pretty good with my 400 Hz
>tone.
>
>73,
>
>
>
>
>In a message dated 6/5/2010 3:03:23 P.M. GMT Standard Time, w5pny@arrl.net
>writes:
>
>
>There are a number of things I like about 2.043B -- one seems  to be
>that the CAT interface seems a tab more robust.  I might just  be
>dreaming it, but I've written a number of programs for my Orion  II
>that use the CAT interface and one problem has always been that
>if  one is sending a long sequence of commands that don't generate
>responses to  the Orion, some of the commands are not executed
>by the Orion.   Increasing the delay between commands helps, the
>the delays required seem  to vary in not so predictable ways.
>That problem SEEMS to be better than  with 2.039d.
>
>BUT -- I really really dislike to new NR algorithm --  particularly
>as it affects the side-tone, even with the NR off.  After  a couple
>days of operating with 2.043B, I finally had enough and  went
>back to 2.039d.  It seems to me the new NR algorithm is doing  things
>even when NR is off...  I hope the next release either reverts  to
>the old NR algorithm or gives the user a choice of which one he  wants.
>In any case, the side-tone is atrocious unless kept at very low  levels
>and/or NR is invoked at fairly high levels.  For those of us  in
>very quiet locations, that drives me nuts.
>
>73,
>Harry, W5PNY
>
>
>
>--
>
>Harry G.  McGavran, Jr.
>
>E-mail:  w5pny@arrl.net
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec  mailing  list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>