| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Product Status Update |
| From: | Martin Ewing <martin.s.ewing@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:00:41 -0500 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I appreciate the informative email as well. (Next step - John Henry's very own blog site? :-) One question on the 565 updates. I wonder just what updates would be optimizations for contesting as against "casual use"? I wasn't aware of any great conflict there! Anyone have thoughts about this? Stability is a goal that everyone can appreciate. Maybe a contester doesn't care so much about NR and notch functions. Or getting the audio levels balanced correctly? 73 -- Martin S. Ewing, AA6E Member IEEE, URSI, AAS, ARRL Branford, Connecticut _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Product Status Update, John Molenda |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Product Status Update, art davis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Product Status Update, John Molenda |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Product Status Update, art davis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |