To: | wb5jnc@centurytel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] What's the current consensus on PTO grease? |
From: | Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:32:02 -0600 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Al, thanks for catching that grade of Dow grease question. I only had one grade, and have not had a chance to evaluate the 44 Light. I am sorry, that is right, there were different grades, and what we had in the lab was 44 Medium. We have used it extensively on packing precision bearings in other higher speed instruments, for its thermal properties. As a wide range operating temperature grease, it does not work out of bearings, and it does not harden over time. It exceeds what the natural petroleum grease can do in that regard. -Stuart Rohre K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Bertrand's comments on the Eagle, Richards |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] What's the current consensus on PTO grease?, Jack Mandelman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] What's the current consensus on PTO grease?, Al Gulseth |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] What's the current consensus on PTO grease?, Jack Mandelman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |