| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII |
| From: | Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:52:06 -0600 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
W5BXE, Why not the Eagle? The Eagle looks good for the type of ham you describe yourself as being. And it would go over better with the XYL vs. the cost of the VII. The VII sounds more like a contester rig to me and it is larger than the compact Eagle. I would have had an Eagle by now, but have been busy with other things. Stuart Rohre K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] OMNI VII, Richard Bell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII, d . e . warnick |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] OMNI VII, Richard Bell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII, Richard Bell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |