TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] DDS Dilemma

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] DDS Dilemma
From: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:33:13 +0100
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Ron,

It would be almost trivial to mount the N4YG board in an enclosure, 
connect to the accessory socket of the Corsair, and have a switch which 
allowed you to opt between the DDS and the internal PTO. If you were 
happy with the "Split" functionality of the DDS there would be no need 
for any further circuitry; but if you wanted the "Listen on A+B" 
functionality of the 263 you would need to replicate the VFO 
switching/mixer board.

73,
Steve G3TXQ

On 03/08/2011 02:18, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
> Considering how relatively rare the remote VFOs for the Corsair&  Corsair II
> are, Steve's post makes one wonder if it would be cost effective for a third
> party to make a "new" RVFO using the N4YG board as it's heart.
>
> And if it was cost effective, would there be enough of a demand for one?
>
> 73
>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>