TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] some Confusion--Argosy Alignment

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] some Confusion--Argosy Alignment
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Reply-to: ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:58:21 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I am not entirely sure what it is I am trying to achieve with the scope and not 
sure what they mean by triming r1 for mixer balance at 21.320.

I cannot say anything specifically about the Argosy.

Generally speaking in a "Balanced Mixer" the input signals feeding through to the mixer 
output are minimized when the mixer is adjusted for best balance. So for instance if the inputs 
were a 9 MHz IF and a 16 MHz LO, and the desired output is 7 MHz, mixer balance adjustments will 
minimize the amount of 19 MHz and 9 MHz signal on the output of the mixer. There is another mixing 
product in the scenario, 25 MHz, that has to be removed by bandpass filters or a trap. The 9 MHz 
IF, being fairly close to the desired 7 MHz output, could still have significant power even after 
bandpass filtering, if it were not "balanced out" by the balance adjustments on the mixer.

A similar situation exists with "Balanced Modulators" in which the "Carrier" is 
minimized by the mixer balance adjustment, leaving only the two sidebands, one of which is passed 
through a bandpass filter and the other drastically reduced by that filter. The carrier is on the 
filter skirt where it would not be sufficiently attenuated by virtue of the filter by itself. By 
balancing the mixer the carrier feed through can be greatly attenuated.

DE N6KB


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>