TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Older rigs

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Older rigs
From: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@verizon.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:56:28 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I think the answer is two factors, three if you count operator skill:

(1) Use of CW. Even the oldest xmtr or comparable power can put out a 
clean CW signal.

(2) Low noise receiver, no digital hash or synthesizer phase noise.

Also, what antenna do you use?

                     73,
                      Bob WB2VUF


On 8/10/2012 7:59 PM, Richards wrote:
> Well... just think...   I bet you could have knocked those
> down in half the time, with a newer TT rig...     ;-)
>
>
>        [But seriously, folks,... congratulations, and well said.]
>
> ---------------------------  K8JHR  --------------------------------
>
> On 8/10/2012 7:51 PM, Curt wrote:
>> Not sure why, but remain impressed by capabilities of my older Ten-Tec rigs
>> ( 540, 544, 546 ).  With little effort this afternoon, Bulgaria, Gibraltar,
>> Slovenia, Slovak Republic in about 30 minutes using the 544 on cw.  Not many
>> bells and whistles, still FB.
>     _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
> _ .
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5195 - Release Date: 08/12/12
>
>

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>