TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni VII Question

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII Question
From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:59:05 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Thanks Carl.  I'd forgot about that one.  Yes, I've confirmed that it can 
exist while using and then terminating various radio control softwares.

73
Bob, K4TAX




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py2@earthlink.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 6:53 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII Question


> One cause for the problem is running a logging program that does not use
> RTS/CTS handshaking.  This causes the Omni VII to sometimes receive
> garbage messages and develop a transmit offset.  The fix is to power off
> and back on and make sure the logging program uses RTS/CTS handshaking
> to communicate with the Omni VII.
>
> Carl Moreschi N4PY
> 121 Little Bell Dr.
> Hays, NC 28635
> www.n4py.com
>
> On 8/20/2012 7:29 AM, Charles Strickland wrote:
>> I have also seen this mentioned on the various forums.  I use the Orion 
>> II
>> most of the time.  However I have an Omni VII received on 08-22-07.  I 
>> had
>> the same to occur a few weeks ago for the only time made aware to me. 
>> After
>> confirming there was  no operator error, I powered down and back on and 
>> have
>> not had a re-occurrence.  Don't know if this has been resolved by anyone 
>> as
>> of now.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com 
>> [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
>> On Behalf Of Richard Bell
>> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 7:17 AM
>> To: tentec@contesting.com
>> Subject: [TenTec] Omni VII Question
>>
>> I have occasionally been told my transmit frequency appears not to agree
>> with my VFO display.  Thoughts or suggestions will be greatly appreciated
>> since I am not sure what to think or believe.
>>
>> I know this has been discussed before, so I apologize for using the band
>> width.
>>
>>
>> 73 W5BXE  RB
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>