To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] eagle |
From: | "mcelmer1" <mcelmer1@netecin.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:09:54 -0700 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Makes sense. Mike W8TRN----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 11:21 Subject: Re: [TenTec] eagle I installed the filter in the am slot did a a/b test on 40m with 4 hams got better audio with 2.8 than 2.4.-----Original Message----- From: Barry N1EUSent: Sunday, February 10, 2013 4:24 PM To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment Subject: Re: [TenTec] eagle Is that filter is in the tx signal path of the Eagle? The tx signal isn't filtered entirely in dsp with configurable bandwidth? 73, Barry N1EU On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Rodney <w3krq@dejazzd.com> wrote:I got a 2.8 filter from inrad for my Eagle got great audio reports. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Omni VI + Audio noise, Peter Inskeep |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] STATES WITH MOST CHECKINS, Richards |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] eagle, Rodney |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] eagle, GARY HUBER |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |