| 
K2, 180-250 mA receive
Curt KB5JO
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de> 
To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] A Fun Day with Ham Radio,and a Question about Portable 
Operating 
 
Jeff,
What other rigs are there out there that work 80/40/20/15/10 and possibly 
even 160, yet require only a couple hundred mA on RX? 
I only know of the KX3, with its 250mA.
I'm sure there are loads of rigs with only a couple of bands, but I don't 
know of any other all band rigs like that. 
73
Rick, DJ0IP
-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Herr
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 5:27 PM
To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
Subject: Re: [TenTec] A Fun Day with Ham Radio, and a Question about 
Portable Operating 
This is an outdated perception.  Look at the kx3.
No "portables" draw much more than 250mils on recv these days....and a lot 
do with less. 
-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bwana Bob
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 07:15
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Cc: Jack Emerson
Subject: Re: [TenTec] A Fun Day with Ham Radio, and a Question about 
Portable Operating 
Jack:
Great story!
The radio of choice for portable operation seems to be the Yaesu FT-817.
It runs 2.5W on internal battery and 5 W on external power People seem to 
really like them, though I hear that the receiver overloads in the 
presence of very strong signals, and some folks do not like the menu 
structure. I've never tried one myself.   Most of the other amateur
radios advertised as "portable" draw 1 to 1.5 amps on receive, not too 
good for a battery power budget. At the other end of the spectrum are the 
military packsets, like the AN/PRC-104. They are cool, rugged, and 
expensive, even on the surplus market. Good for spot frequency use, but 
tuning the band won't be that much fun using the frequency selection 
switches. Again, I've never tried one.  In the middle is Ten Tec. While 
they don't seem to be marketing the Argonaut VI as a portable rig, Ten Tec 
has made efforts to keep the receive current drain down and 10 W is a more 
practical level that 2.5 or 5 W, especially for working SSB. A lower cost 
alternative, if you can find one would be the T-T Scout or Argosy.  I have 
successfully used my Scout portable on several occasions. I crank the 
power back to 25-30 W and it will run fine on CW on a 7 Ah battery for at 
least a couple of hours. A bigger battery, like those automotive jump 
starting packs, will give you longer run time.
Running the Scout at lower power will also make it run cooler, which helps 
prevent  VFO drift. The receive current drain for the Scout is 600 mA.  I 
think that the Argo VI would be better, especially if one can buy or 
fabricate a pack or handles for it. 
What do you use for antennas?  My portable preference is simple dipoles 
instead of the short, loaded dipoles and verticals.  I made a reel-out 
dipole from surplus AN/CRT-3 antenna reels and a smaller version using 
plastic "campers clothesline" reels. Here are some antenna ideas from 
N6CC: http://www.n6cc.com/antenna-system-ideas
                73, and let's hear more stories!
                Bob WB2VUF
On 4/6/2013 10:10 PM, Jack Emerson wrote:
     Hey de Jack W4TJE in Fancy Gap, VA. Radio-wise, today has been a 
blast. You know it’s going to be a good radio day when ur working a 
strong Russian station on 15m cw just after ur sunrise, and he tells you 
that he is running a ten tec stn (Omni V). I think in all my years on 
air, that is the first Russian ever worked running Ten Tec gear. Note to 
Ten Tec: Send me an e-mail, and I will send you his call sign. He 
deserves a mug, or at least a cap.
Then, at mid-morning, my buddy Todd, N4LA, drove up from NC with his 
backpacks and portable gear, and he and I then drove a few miles up the 
road, parked, and climbed to the top of Buffalo Mtn in Floyd County, VA. 
Todd and I are the same age (49), from the same town originally in NC 
(Siler City), grew up together, both learned radio together, and even 
have common relatives by marriage. After school, he joined the Navy, 
while I joined the Marine Corps, so it did my heart proud today to show 
the U.S. Navy how a Marine humps to the top of a mountain peak (SINGING 
THE MARINE CORPS ANTHEM WHILE CARRYING BOTH BACKPACKS).
So a full hour after I (USMC) had made it to the top carrying all of the 
gear, Todd (Navy) finally arrived, and we were ready to get on air. We 
set up at the summit at 3970 feet, with me (USMC) doing all the work, 
while Todd (USN) drinking coffee and telling sea stories (LIES) about how 
rough life at sea was for him.It was then that I was introduced to the 
world of the Summits On The Air (SOTA). IT WAS AWESOME.!! We operated 
both phone and cw and put that peak on the air for only the second time. 
We had stns calling us from Europe to the West Coast, and put over 70 of 
them in the log before shutting down and climbing down the mountain ( I 
had to carry Todd, he had ran out of both coffee and sea stories ((LIES)) 
by then).
So now, I’m all pumped about operating SOTA, and checking their web site 
tonight tonight I see that there are quite a few peaks near me that are 
rare or have never even been activated. I’ve never been into qrp, but am 
intrigued by the Argo 6 for use as a SOTA portable rig, but am also 
interested in the Eagle for the same use. So any Argonaut 6 or Eagle 
owners, pse tell me any pros and cons for portable use. I am very 
interested in knowing what ur opinions are, esp with respect to battery 
use/power drain.
And finally, tnx to Todd for introducing me to SOTA today, and don’t get 
mad when you read how I picked on you here on this reflector.
73 de Jack W4TJE
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3272 / Virus Database: 3162/6229 - Release Date:
04/06/13
 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
 |