TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Hamfest??

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Hamfest??
From: Jim Vohland <n9vo@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 20:00:39 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Not a ten tec guru so hesitant to reply.  But I was there yesterday afternoon 
and this morning for the flea market. 

Personally I thought the Friday crowd was down from the two previous ones I 
have experienced. No earth shattering new revaluations equipment that I saw.

Flea market very good good crowd and plenty of sellers. Just like most 
hamfests, most of the equipment priced way high. I mean come on guys 650 for an 
icom 718????? 

Could nitpick a few things but had a nice weekend 

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 28, 2013, at 7:25 PM, "Bryan Lee Cornwell" <blcornwell@k2blc.com> wrote:

> On 9/28/2013 6:24 PM, David and Dianne on Comcast wrote:
>> Why such silence about the TT Hamfest this year?
>> 
>> Years gone by there was a TT web cam on during the two days and lots of 
>> postings during the event.
>> 
>> This year not a whisper from TT or a peep on the reflector from anyone 
>> attending.
>> 
>> Very disappointing. Very strange.
>> 
>> Dave-N1LQ
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2014.0.4142 / Virus Database: 3604/6704 - Release Date: 09/27/13
>> 
>> 
> It was fabulous Dave!!.....Everyone was too busy to do anything else
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>