To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] OT: FCC to re-instate CW requirement for General and Extra |
From: | K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Tue, 01 Apr 2014 14:37:30 -0400 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I think the piece is well done. Well written and credible, in fact.
Too bad it is not true!
The good news is the increased interest in the Code for its own sake, which means new hams are learning and doing code because they want to. CW seems alive and well, thank goodness. Just MY take, anyway. ------------------------ JHR ----------------------- On 4/1/2014 8:18 AM, Doug Reid wrote: Had me happy and angry all at the same time ! _____________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OT: FCC to re-instate CW requirement for General and Extra, Bob Good |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OT: FCC to re-instate CW requirement for General and Extra, Stuart Rohre |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OT: FCC to re-instate CW requirement for General and Extra, Doug Reid |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OT: FCC to re-instate CW requirement for General and Extra, Stuart Rohre |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |