Rick,
OmniRig, whatever it is, is something I've never heard of before. I've
never even heard mention, or hints, of it before on the CQ Contest
reflector, or anywhere else.
If this is something that is used by your contest club, and only by your
contest club... I don't see how it could be a "deal breaker" for the rest of
us. (And if it is simply an issue of having the correct driver written...
but the software author refuses to write the driver... I don't see how this
is the fault of the rig. It comes across as, well, some other things that
don't come across to nicely, so we'll just let that pass for now.)
In any event... I would think that the issue of items 1 & 2 on your list are
certainly addressable. Maybe the question should be not "if Ten-Tec could
easily address" them... but how we (the users or potential users) would
address them considering the design of the rig.
Further, considering your comment that N4PY has said that it can be done
through his software, that tells me that it CAN be done.
So I don't think this is at all the "deal breaker" you make it sound out to
be.
73, ron w3wn
-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Rick -
DJ0IP / NJ0IP
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 4:36 PM
To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Any update on a replacement for the Orion II?
James, there are 3 things that prevent the Eagle from ever becoming any
contest club's (or dx-pedition's) radio of choice:
1): No Band Data available on the back panel to drive external amplifiers,
BPFs, or antenna switches.
2): No Band Stacking Register
3): No proper support from OmniRig
I don't know if Ten-Tec could easily address #1 and 2 or not. Perhaps.
#3 is a show stopper on its own.
OmniRig is basically a middleware.
It sits between the application and the rig and takes commands from the
application and passes them on to the radio using the radio's own command
language.
You might also consider OmniRig as an API.
It presents a common interface to any open or 3rd party applications,
enabling that application to send generic radio control commands to the
application which with the help of OmniRig are passed on in radio-specific
commands to whatever radio is selected.
The problem is, the ORION-2 driver of OmniRig is missing a couple of
specific commands which enable it to operate seamlessly with an Eagle. This
has NOTHING to do with the fact that the Eagle uses a USB2 I/F to the
computer.
However, when I asked the author of OmniRig to write a driver specifically
for the Eagle, he refused to do so and the reason "HE" gave was that it has
a USB port instead of a serial port. I know this is bull shit, but that's
what he said!
He recommended I write my own driver.
I tried.
I downloaded the OR-2 driver, then added some additional commands which I
thought would fix the problems.
My driver failed miserably. I'm a dud when it comes to writing software.
Guess I have 3 left hands.
Shortly after CQWW CW last year I spoke with Carl and he suggested a way
that I could use his N4PY software (which I use already for 10 years, but
not in contests) and couple it together with my WinTest Contest Software
(which uses OmniRig) and that it would work.
I trust Carl and am confident it will work and I fully intend to try that
later this year.
But I am just as confident I would never convince any contest team or
DX-pedition team on the planet to deploy such a complex implementation, just
so they could use an Eagle.
73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of K8JHR
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 1:52 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Any update on a replacement for the Orion II?
Pshaw - Rick... your argument proves too much: If your club needs to
standardize on just one radio to avoid operator error, maybe it needs
better operators! ;-) ;-) ;-) Ha!
Besides, it would be easier to standardize on the Eagle than the K3,
which is more complicated to operate. I think there is an aura
surrounding the K3 that transcends it true value.
Moreover, what sort of "operator error" are you worried about? The guys in
MY club can set up and run any radio, and most do well enough using default
settings. I can read the user manual on the flight to the site.
If you really take two years to plan the deal, you should have plenty of
time to learn how to work more than one radio.
But, if ease of operation is paramount, both the Eagle and Omni VII are
easier to learn and use than the K3, and the Eagle gives up nothing in size,
weight, and performance to the K3 - and costs about $1500 less!
But wait... there's more!
You cannot fairly blame the gang in Sevierville for why the Eagle is not a
popular travel rig. That decision is made elsewhere, and for various
reasons - UNLESS the K3 is popular because Elecraft subsidizes the venture
by providing free or super low-rent gear - which hardly makes it the better
radio.
You portray these DX-peditions as more difficult than they must be. I have
run remote special event stations - which is similar to working a
DX-pedition, but you don't travel as far, and besides the greater
complexities in making travel and shipping arrangements, the operation is
similar - you sit and run thousands of contacts each hour because THE WHOLE
WORLD IS CALLING YOU! It is kinda like fishing at the hatchery.
I make way more contacts working a remote special event station, than at
home.
I suspect success is more dependent on factors excluding the radio, such as
antenna selection, site selection, propagation, advance publicity, and etc.,
and perhaps it depends as much on money and endurance, than operator skill!
________________
BOTTOM LINE -- IF I SPEND $50,000 to go ON A DX-PEDITION - I TAKE ANY DING
DANG RADIO I WANT. PERIOD. After all... if its MY money, then it is my
choice, and I would take and Omni VII or Eagle long before I would take a K3
on such a venture (unless Elecraft made me an offer I could
not refuse!) Why spend $1000 to $1500 more than necessary on a travel
rig?
Just MY TAKE - if guys don't take the Eagle on DX-peditions, it is their
mistake and their loss.
--------------------- K8JHR ----------------------
On 4/5/2014 4:20 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
.
>
> Unfortunately Ten-Tec hasn't much mind share with the boys doing the
> planning.
> Don't hold your breath expecting to see Eagles out there any time soon.
> In a smaller, controlled environment where a handful of guys all know
> each other, then several Eagles would make good sense.
> But when 30 operators from several different countries come together
> and meet for the first time on site, it's better to have equipment
> that you are sure everybody knows. Currently that is the K3.
>
>__________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|