TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Merger

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Merger
From: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW via TenTec" <tentec@contesting.com>
Reply-to: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 16:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I believe one of their strategies is to continue to appeal to the Maker 
movement... hence the Rebel and now the Patriot.  John Henry has said (via one 
of the TT reflectors) that they've generated a healthy interest from Makers to 
where quite a few have gotten their license because of the Rebel.  This tells 
me they may be projecting a better revenue stream via lower cost designs that 
use open source hardware (e.g., Arduino) where TT doesn't have to incur the 
cost of expensive chips to build a radio.  If their design-to-market 
development cycle can be shortened due to not designing as many an el' primo 
radios, but instead share the development via social/community involvement for 
coding - then their margin per unit may very well be significantly better than 
the higher end radios.   

Hold on to your cans, and don't start screaming into your microphones because I 
said not as many el' primo radios.  I suspect they'll develop a very nice radio 
to match the quality and expectations that align with an Alpha product 
(complete station concept).  However, mid-range radios could be more in-line 
with the Omni VII as a VII plus, or VIII with a rather long market presence due 
to the upgradeability of the Omni VII.  John H. just recently mentioned that 
with a change in the code structure the memory in the Omni VII can be totally 
readdressed therefore making room for significantly more features.  Now you 
say... come on Eric, no way...  Well, you have to remember two things:  1. 
we're getting old, and the younger generations don't have, nor probably will 
not ever have the spare change to buy a lot of Orion III's like mine (late 
X-Gen), and your generation has been able too (Baby Boomers, X-Gen's).  2. They 
have to remain viable as a
 business and to do so, as their customer demographics change so will Ten-Tec.  

So here's W9WLW's crystal ball projection:

Highest margin per unit = Hacker/Maker/Kit  e.g., Rebel, Patriot, etc. (caveat, 
to do this they'll have to upgrade their way of socializing the community 
development effort) <Why the Sales Manager mentioned Facebook, and other social 
media>

Mid-range margin per unit = high end contest grade radio e.g., Orion III  
(would have been low range, but they'll be able to ask more per radio if they 
peg the market correctly and combine the look with an Alpha amp)

Low/Mid-range margin per unit = upgrades, add-on boards, to their current 
fleet, and accessories 

Low-range margin = mid-range radios such as the Eagle and Omni VII with longer 
presence on the market (pfft... look at the TS-2000 that radio is over 12 years 
old in design and still selling for Kenwood)

Please realize I'm not addressing volume per unit of sales, just margins... 
it's all a guess on my part with some background and understanding on product 
development.  If TT can engage and get the hacker/makers/kit guys following 
them; then their revenue could soar based on volume sales with low product 
development cost.

I shall cover my crystal ball for now, and see how things ride out for RF 
Concepts.

73
 
-Eric
W9WLW
http://w9wlw.blogspot.com/ ;


>________________________________
> From: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
>To: tentec@contesting.com 
>Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 6:39 PM
>Subject: Re: [TenTec] Merger
>  
>
>Seriously, how many hams do you think he saw who were of the age 
>demographic to be on Facebook or Twitter?
>I hadn't noticed a lot of young people in the crowd when we were there 
>last year.
>
>I'm on Facebook and, in addition to staying in contact with friends and 
>family who are scattered all over the country, there's a lot of good 
>ham-related stuff on there.
>The QRZ page, for example.  Twitter...well, I have an account, but 
>rarely look at it.
>
>If the new Sales and Marketing Manager thinks that even 50 "likes" on 
>Facebook is significant, he's borderline delusional.
>
>73 de Jim - AD6CW
>
>
>On 5/20/2014 1:23 PM, TTMaven wrote:
>> The new Sales and Marketing Manager delivered a running monolog, 
>> saying TT will focus on Facebook and Twitter feeds ... er... um ... as 
>> if that is a fresh, innovative approach.  He offered no other answer 
>> or approach when asked about it,  saying one could receive as many as 
>> 4 Tweets a day!  Now, I don't do Facebook or Twitter, and I doubt 
>> getting 4 tweets a day from could induce me to buy anything from 
>> anyone; more likely it would chase me off completely.
>>
>> Oh well.   I continue to hope for the best.  Maybe younger hams will 
>> like that approach, but it falls flat on me.  Mr. Coultas said before 
>> he came along, TT had something like 25 Facebook "Likes" - and he has 
>> already doubled that number!   Yeah... that should do it; we are 
>> moving now!
>>
>> That is just MY take... your mileage may differ.
>>
>> ===================== K8JHR  ===================
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
>    
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>