TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni VI & SignaLink USB

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI & SignaLink USB
From: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:05:41 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
QST just arrived and it has an article on problems associated with the USB 
Signalink. 

I love my inexpensive EASY-DIGI and get great results with it.

Best regards - Bry Carling AF4K



> On Jul 10, 2014, at 5:40 PM, qdot22@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> It's interesting that the Tigertronics unit does not support full FSK. That's 
> why I went with the cheaper Bucscomm Rascal.
> 
> Rich, AA6VX
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Jul 10, 2014, at 2:15 PM, "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> My reference to input and output impedances and to transformers on the input 
>> and output are from Tigertronics
>> 
>> As provided with the SignaLink USB  data sheet.
>> 
>> I  quote;
>> "Radio In/Out Z:    600 Ohm (nom).  TX/RX Levels are fully adjustable for
>>           compatibility with Hi-Z and Low-Z radio connections."
>> 
>> From SignaLink USB data sheet I quote:
>> "Unlike some interfaces on the market, ALL SignaLink models COMPLETELY 
>> isolate your computer from your radio.  This eliminates troublesome ground 
>> loops and prevents hum and noise from degrading the signals.  The SignaLink 
>> USB provides isolation through the use of audio transformers and a 
>> relay-based PTT keying circuit."
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 73
>> Bob, K4TAX
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Brown" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
>> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 12:18 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI & SignaLink USB
>> 
>> 
>>>> On 7/10/2014 6:41 AM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
>>>> Tigertronics i.e. SignaLink has transformers on the input and output 
>>>> signals for isolation.
>>> 
>>> A transformer does NOT provide isolation to differential mode signals. It 
>>> only blocks common mode signals. For example, audio voltage on both 
>>> windings of a 1:1 transformer are equal, and no impedance is added to the 
>>> differential circuit. In a 4:1 transformer, the voltages are proportional 
>>> to the turns ratio, and the impedance looking into the transformer is equal 
>>> to terminating Z multiplied by the square of the turns ratio.
>>> 
>>> Remember that "600 ohms" has not been used in pro audio for at least 40 
>>> years. Output stages are low-Z sources, typically 100 ohms for pro 
>>> products, 300 ohms or more for consumer stuff, and input stages are high 
>>> impedance, typically 10K for pro products, 50K for consumer products. The 
>>> impedance of a microphone is defined as 1/5 of it's recommended minimum 
>>> load impedance, and a low-Z mic's output Z is typically on the order of 100 
>>> ohms. All commonly used ham mics are low-Z, wired unbalanced.
>>> 
>>> As you have described the schematic, with individual 10K in series with 
>>> both the mic and line inputs, I agree there should be good isolation. 
>>> Perhaps the schematic is not accurate?
>>> 
>>> 73, Jim K9YC
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>