TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OT: Kenwood announces new improved "TS-590SG"

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Kenwood announces new improved "TS-590SG"
From: george fritkin via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
Reply-to: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:12:46 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
WOW an improvement from 10-5 to 10-6.  All of us TS590 owners are going to 
scrap our radios!!
 
And it will never beat the EAGLE.
 
George, W6GF 


On Friday, October 10, 2014 6:42 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP <Rick@DJ0IP.de> wrote:
  


Me too Barry ... with the 599.
I was curious why I couldn't find as much info in English as in German.

If the TX spurious problem is cured, this should make the guys in California
happy.
Getting the OEMs to clean up their transmitters is one of my pet themes.

73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt am Main)


-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry N1EU
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 2:40 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Kenwood announces new improved "TS-590SG"

Was just trying to be helpful Rick - no personal interest, I'm quite happy
with my 565 and 566  ;-)

73, Barry N1EU

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP <Rick@dj0ip.de>
wrote:

> Barry, this one gives a bit more detail in English:
> http://www.radiocronache.com/category/kenwood/
>
> If I read it correctly, downward conversion is now used on all bands, 
> any time the bandwidth is less than 2.7kHz.
> This should improve the high bands performance (BDR3).
>
> From the description of the changes made to the AGC, it appears the 
> problem with the electric fence sparks which Rob Sherwood has been 
> complaining to all companies about, has been addressed.
>
> There is no mention of the improvement to spurious emissions.
> I dug that out myself by scrutinizing the specifications.
> It could be that Kenwood does not want to awaken awareness that they 
> ever had a problem with this.
> If indeed this problem is fixed, then Kenwood will have distanced 
> itself from Yaesu and Icom in this price class.
> Those other two companies still have some homework to do.
>
> The list price is about $2K but apparently there is an introductory 
> price of $1.5K.
> Certainly "the heat is on" in the mid-range!
>
> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry 
> N1EU
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 1:11 PM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Kenwood announces new improved "TS-590SG"
>
> Here's Kenwood's press release in English:
>
> http://www.jvckenwood.co.jp/en/press/2014/10/press_141002.pdf
>
> 73, Barry N1EU
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP <Rick@dj0ip.de>
> wrote:
>
> > Competition for the Eagle in the entry-level high performance 
> > transceiver class.
> >
> > Several aspects of the radio are said to be improved, including the 
> > receiver.
> >
> > Unfortunately I only have details in German language.
> > There are several improvements but the one I was looking for has 
> > apparently been addressed:  "Spurious Emissions"
> > . Old TS-590S:    -50dB
> > . New TS 590SG:   -60dB
> > It will be interesting to see how much this improves the former 
> > problem with broadband noise generation.
> >
> > For info in German:
> > http://www.kenwood.de/products/comm/amateur/hf_all/TS-590SG/details/
> > Surely this document is also available in English.
> >
> > Seems Kenwood will once again take a shot at the Eagle.
> > I'm anxiously awaiting Rob Sherwood's test results.
> >
> > 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> > (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>