TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 13:41:58 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yeah, like that!  I was arguing for keeping it because the side-tone is real
time and it just blended in over the Rx audio a tiny bit.  But, folks who
have been accustomed to quasi-QSK got their way and that "feature" is no
longer there.  You would probably have to go back several software/FW
iterations to try it.

Paul, W9AC

-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry N1EU
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 1:26 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4

You mean like latent receive audio mixing with non-latent sidetone audio?
 ;-)

Barry N1EU

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net> wrote:

> Well, image #7 shows the latency from the time of physical key-up to 
> the point Rx audio is present.  It shows a lot of other interesting 
> things going on too.
>
> Paul, W9AC
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry 
> N1EU
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 8:48 AM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4
>
> Paul you're measuring specifically cw transmit latency, correct?
>
> You did a really professional job of it - nice work!
>
> 73, Barry N1EU
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net> wrote:
>
> > > Sorry Barry, latency measured on the Anan does not necessarily 
> > > apply to
> > the FLEX 6000.
> >
> > I made timing and latency measurements of my Flex 6700 using an 
> > Agilent 4-channel DSO.  I captured the data and uploaded the DSO 
> > graphic
> images.
> > Keep an eye on the PTT trace from the external keyer as the timing
> > reference.    QSK performance has improved further since the date of
> these
> > measurements.  QSK performance is at least as good as the K3 and the
many
> > Ten Tecs I've owned.   It is fast.  At 40+ wpm, I don't feel like I'm
> > dragging characters behind me due to any latency, and there are no 
> > headphone audio thumps or clicks in CW T/R transitions.
> >
> >
> > https://community.flexradio.com/flexradio/topics/flex_6700_cw_keying
> > _v
> > _elecr
> > aft_k3
> >
> > Paul, W9AC
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>