TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Dirty Transmitters

To: "'terry foskey'" <n5tf@yahoo.com>, "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Dirty Transmitters
From: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 05:41:41 +0100
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Of course "you" do, but what do your neighbors thing?

Please stop sugar-coating the problem.
Even Flex recoginized it and fixed it with the 6000 series.
IMO, the 5000 should not be allowed on the bands unless QRP.

73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)



-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of terry foskey 
via TenTec
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 12:43 AM
To: TenTec@contesting.com
Cc: terry foskey
Subject: [TenTec] Dirty Transmitters

 Rick, A few days ago we had a healthy discussion on dirty transmitters.See:  
http://www.sm5bsz.com/dynrange/dubus313.pdf
I agree it is something the manufacturers could improve upon, but probably 
won't be a priority.  The last two sentences in the study echo what I stated in 
my emails. The Flex 5000 might be dirty, but when I really need a SSB DX 
station, I skip the Orion 1, Orion 2 and use the Flex 5000.  When coupled with 
the Alpha, nothing at my house beats it on SSB. N5TF, Terry 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>