| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Support Allocation of Overhead |
| From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:47:54 -0700 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On Sun,3/13/2016 2:45 PM, Gary Follett wrote: If you don't like the "New" Ten Tec, buy something else. At this point, we have no idea whatsoever about the nature of the "new" Ten Tec. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Scout troubles, Al Gulseth |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Service, overhead, and the future. A/K/A/ I've got my 2 cents!, rick@dj0ip.de |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Support Allocation of Overhead, Gary Follett |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Support Allocation of Overhead, Bryan Lee Cornwell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |