TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Frequency Problem

To: TenTec reflector <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Frequency Problem
From: art N4UC <n4uc@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 23:10:55 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The ARRL really enjoyed their April issues back then. I can't remember the last 
time I read a good April fools article in QST. 

> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 18:51:24 -0500
> From: jim.allen@longhornband.net
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Frequency Problem
> 
> It was actually April, 1968, same pages.
> 
> Sorry.  The papyrus scroll I consulted was a bit faded.
> 
> 73 de W6OGC  Jim Allen
> 
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
> wrote:
> 
> > The nomographs appeared in QST, May, 1968, pp 48-49.  I think you could
> > get a handy dandy one suitable for shop work for $2.95 plus 25 cents
> > postage to ARRL, Newington CT.  There were two styles.
> >
> > Once you figured out how to work a nomograph, it was easy.
> >
> > 73 de W6OGC  Jim Allen
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Augie "Gus" Hansen <
> > augie.hansen@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Actually it's kc/s to kHz, a 1:1 relationship.
> >>
> >> 73,
> >> Gus
> >>
> >> On 4/23/2016 1:39 PM, art N4UC wrote:
> >>
> >>> convert kc ---> khz? Somebody could make a lot of money if they came up
> >>> with an app for that!
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> TenTec mailing list
> >> TenTec@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
                                          
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>