TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC At Dayton

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC At Dayton
From: <gyates@dreamscape.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 13:12:10 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Tim,

Thanks, that worked.

-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tim
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 1:07 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC At Dayton

Hi Greg,

Force your browser to reload. Shift + Reload current page, right?

Tim
KE4KE


On 05/22/2016 12:03 PM, gyates@dreamscape.com wrote:
> Tried the web site again and just tentec in the upper left.  Maybe I 
> am using the wrong URL.
>
> Greg, WB2BIN
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ron 
> Notarius W3WN
> Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 12:58 PM
> To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC At Dayton
>
> I'll tell you what guys.
>
> I took almost 300 pictures Friday & yesterday (got home very late last 
> night and I slept in!).  Give me a little time to go through them, 
> I'll pull out some of the TT booth related ones and upload them to the 
> files area, presuming I can.
>
> Let me add that this is the first time I've met Mike Dishop in person 
> (we've exchanged a few emails since he took over).  Very nice guy, and 
> I am very impressed.  Suffice to say that he is committed to Ten Tec; 
> I think we're in good hands.
>
> Granted, things have not gone as fast as many of us hoped, but there 
> are reasons.  Given time, I think things will be OK.
>
> 73, ron w3wn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of steve 
> jobes via TenTec
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 6:02 PM
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Cc: steve jobes
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC At Dayton
>
> can someone please take some pictures of the booth and post them for 
> us folks who couldn't make it out there I would appreciate it. Have 
> fun and enjoy,
>
> 73,
> Steve W1DXH
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Henry <jshenry1963@gmail.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Fri, May 20, 2016 10:16 am
> Subject: [TenTec] TEN-TEC At Dayton
>
> Mike Dishop said he was going to be there, He is listed in the vendor 
> list....
>
> Alpha Amplifier \ Dishtronix \ Emtron \ Ten-Tec EH0548 EH0549 EH0550 
> Paid Mike Dishop
>
> So, go check them out, and see what is new... I'm sure you will be 
> surprised and delighted....
>
> Thanks,
> 73, KI4JPL
> John Henry
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7597 / Virus Database: 4568/12277 - Release Date: 
> 05/22/16
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7597 / Virus Database: 4568/12277 - Release Date: 05/22/16

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>