TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group
From: <ka9egw@ka9egw.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:09:44 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I note that the maximum to minimum capacitance ratio of vacuum caps has it
all over air variables, and I feel that has real merit for a super wide
range link tuner of the JVM/Anneke sort, but I am afraid that particular
project will have to wait until after I win the lottery...
73, Brian KA9EGW

-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Al Gulseth
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 8:39 AM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Cc: Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group

Paul,

Why the need for a rotating turret? Wouldn't switching taps accomplish the
same thing? Cliplead taps on the coil have been a staple of link coupled
systems since the early days of ham radio, and it seems to me that one could
locate the optimum taps for each band and then use relays to switch them. 
Doing it that way shouldn't be any more complex than a typical autotuner is.

73, Al

On Mon July 18 2016 6:47:02 am Paul Christensen wrote:
> ...
> A remote-controlled link tuner would by my Holy Grail, but the 
> mechanical complexities start getting in the way of improved 
> efficiency.  To do it right would require separate link coils moved on a
rotating turret.
> ...
>
> Paul, W9AC
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>