TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] RE Paragraphs

To: <k9yc@arrl.net>, "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RE Paragraphs
From: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:39:55 +0200
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yes, but I wrote my comment about html in "2017", not 1997.
Most of us have advanced beyond using our old Model 15 teletypes as our
printer.

73- Rick


-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 9:35 AM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RE Paragraphs

On 10/19/2017 12:26 AM, rick@dj0ip.de wrote:
> You're probably right, Jim, but being as the entire Internet is based 
> upon HTML, it shouldn't be the problem!

Actually, the standard for many email reflectors is plain text. When html
doesn't work on a reflector, it's likely that that reflector is plain text
and that it ignores HTML.

73, Jim


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>