TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Noise blanker recommendations

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Noise blanker recommendations
From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:20:51 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yes, original Orion has the same NR/NB features.

73, Barry N1EU

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:18 PM, P C Andy Anderson <xtraham58@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi John, I have a TT Orion 2 and am very satisfied with both the Noise
> Reduction and the Noise Blanker. I am not sure if the Orion (original) has
> these same features.
>
>
> Now that they have SAF, Selective Audio Filtering also it makes it hard to
> beat.
>
>
> My 2 cents, Andy.... W3LI
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> I was making a rather serious (given my small antennas) effort today in the
> Illinois QSO Party and had to deal with this intermittent noise I have here
> for pretty much the entire contest.  It is a raspy, hash type noise that
> will be on for 2 or 3 seconds, then will end, but come back every 20 to 30
> seconds.  I  have figured out it is not in my house, and doesn't seem to be
> power line noise.  At one time I thought I had localized it to a house
> about 4 houses to the west of me, but the house is now unoccupied, but the
> noise is still there.
>
> Anyways, I was using the Kenwood TS950SD which I just picked up, and it is
> a great rig with lots of receiver tools.  The noise blanker pretty much
> knocked out the noise, but it also produced plenty of IMD products when the
> band got busy and put a raspy sound on many of the signals, so I was having
> to turn the NB off and on trying to make the signals as best as I could
> with this noise.  Even engaged the attenuator a few times on 40m which
> helped a little, but also weakened signals.
>
> I have had a slight windfall recently and can afford to get a newer, better
> rig if I want.  Are there any recent Ten Tecs that have noise blankers that
> take out many different types of noise, but don't mess with the receive
> signals and receiver dynamic range?  I wonder if the DSP based noise
> blankers are better?  An older rig would be ok also if it would meet those
> criteria.
>
> 73 John AF5CC
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Flists.contesting.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%
> 2Ftentec&data=02%7C01%7CDgparsons51%40hotmail.com%
> 7C47be8c1a915b4bf2250408d51a2c09ae%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaa
> aaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636443698809463950&sdata=cO5vUQQFv2roeHyGmaqgMz6u8wLvLK
> HdCSg38NdExxk%3D&reserved=0
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>