TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec 228 vs 229 Ant Tuner

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec 228 vs 229 Ant Tuner
From: Winston <jones_winston@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:53:19 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The model 228 was a 200-watt tuner, with SWR meter and sliding coil contact, 
much smaller. I think you meant to say 238, which is later version of 229, as 
others have mentioned.
I once bought a used 4229 kit version, which didn’t work. Sent to Ten Tec 
repair, they said builder had wired switch backwards.
 
73, Winston K4CWQ

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 23, 2018, at 2:45 PM, Mike Pagel <k9uw@wi-net.com> wrote:
> 
> See http://tentecwiki.eqth.net/doku.php?id=tuners 
> 
> As far as I know, the differences between the 229 and 238 were cosmetic, 
> mostly to match the colors and knobs of rigs being produced at the time.
> 
> 73, de Mike, K9UW
> Amherst, WI
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Greg S via 
> TenTec
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 12:56 PM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> Cc: Greg S <oldlongbeard@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec 228 vs 229 Ant Tuner
> 
> You mean 229 and 238, I am guessing. Latest 2 or 3 Iterations of the 238 used 
> a turns counter for the inductor. Last one (C) has cross needle meter. 
> Ceramic capacitor values changed slightly from the 229. The 4229 was a kit 
> version.... Early. Voltage baluns. Prolly stir up some angst, but I wouldn't 
> use the balun without reworking it. Just me. Not sure of transformation 
> value.... Others will know. Greg, KC8HXO
> --------------------------------------------
> On Fri, 2/23/18, Edward Mccann via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com> wrote:
> 
> Subject: [TenTec] Ten-Tec 228 vs 229  Ant Tuner
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Cc: "Edward Mccann" <edwmccann@yahoo.com>
> Date: Friday, February 23, 2018, 1:02 PM
> 
> Can anyone enlighten me (and others) as to  differences between the later 229 
> models and 228 models. 
> Presumably some technical improvements
> were made?
> 
> Re the installed  balun : is it a
> current or voltage balun, and is it 1:1 or 4:1 ?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 73
> AG6CX
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>